We took on the project with a $5,000 budget and a 3-week timeline, and confirmed the main constraints: $2 per subscriber and a stream of moderation rejections. In the research phase ($1,000) we found top channels using SPY services and our AI selection tool and tested creative formats — expensive at $2, but we knew where to dig.
We built a focused action plan around the core solution: fix what moderation was cutting and concentrate spend on channels that actually convert, instead of pushing flashy banners that kept getting declined.
In the cleanup phase ($2,000) the team completed the main work: selected the working creatives, replaced the flashy banners that moderation was rejecting, launched one channel at a time, and filtered out fraud — bringing the cost to $0.50 per subscriber.
We validated which channels held their cost and quality, keeping the winners and cutting the rest so budget only went to sources that performed.
In the scaling phase ($2,000) we pooled the best channels and scaled, delivering the final outcome: $0.74 per subscriber during scaling and $0.57 across the full campaign.
$0.57 per subscriber (KPI was $1)
$2 → $0.57 · 3.5× cheaper
Clean creatives + channel-by-channel launch
